
"Mr. Nobusuke Tagomi thought, There is no answer. No understanding. Even in the oracle. Yet I must go on living day to day anyhow.
I will go and find the small. Live unseen, at any rate. Until some later time when --"
The Man in the High Castle - Phillip K. Dick
In "The Man in the High Castle" Phillip K. Dick shows a present where the allies lost the war. This is not a very uncommon idea. Indeed, it had been developed by many writers, and even film makers. The short story "Catch that Zeppelin" by Fritz Leiber (Hugo and Nebula award) and the movie "The Fatherland", were excellent examples of this. But "The Man in the High Castle" is for sure one of the first main works where such an alternative history is described.
Moreover, it is the only one that I know about that focuses on the japanese side of a victorious axis.
Of course, Dick is far more interested in challenging the usual concept of reality, than in any other thing.
One of the main characters of the novel is a japanese guy, Nobosuke Tagomi san. In the "real" reality such an individual could had been anyone between the armies of salary-man that keep running this country. This Japan that someones think that has lost pretty much of its soul and it is the paradox itself, champions of post-modern world, and somehow lost in translation.
But under an imperial and hegemonic Japan, Tagomi san would have became the son of a very different country.
So, it could be interesting to know what the japaneses think about this character. Really Dick was able to understand what to be japanese means to be?
But has this question any sense at all?
In august 15, 1945, Japan surrendered, under the shadow of Hiroshima. The Empire was destroyed. A way of life ceased to exist. Nobody would ever know if Tagomi san would be a reasonable possibility walking on the San Francisco streets not like a businessman or a tourist, but like a conqueror.